Camera security.
Filed under: Comm
The security, surveillance stuff from yesterday is still on my mind. I was thinking that will all the stuff available you could really have your own personal surveillance society set up at home. You could pick up a CCTV system for home and record everything you do, although I don’t really see the point on that one. I can see it for security purposes, sure, but if you did I know I would want a closed system. Mainly cause if you are connected to anything then you have to deal with people hacking into your cameras and watching you, also the premise of a few movies. I wonder how they deal with that in Britain, is it something they have problems with. Can you imagine, with all the cameras they supposedly have around? I wonder if they are all connected and feeding to a central database or repository. They might even have issues with people watching their cameras and not know it. Then again you have cameras that people are supposed to watch, most of the traffic cameras in the states are accessible to the public so they can take a look at conditions themselves. Then there is also the Google camera stuff, although it is not current. There are a lot of other cameras available though, tourist cameras and summit cameras and cameras like that.
Following that line of thought, how secure are the security companies that provide monitoring and recording services? I assume they probably have to be fairly secure because they could be liable for any problems with their services. It is an interesting thought, I wonder how many actually take that into consideration when picking a security system for their homes. I think that would really be more of a problem than the cameras all over Britain or the ones in the United States. Most of those are in public places so you really wouldn’t be seeing much you couldn’t see by sitting in a roadside café and watching the people go by.
Tags: camera weakness, closed circuit, security, security camera
